Air India Crash: Expert Suggests Pilot Action Behind Tragedy
Introduction
A recent Air India tragedy has gripped the nation and aviation world. New findings point to a disturbing possibility: the deadly crash of Air India Flight 171 may have been caused by deliberate human action in the cockpit. Aviation experts and investigators are now searching for answers, with growing public concern and demand for transparency.
The Crash: What Happened?
Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, departed Ahmedabad for London Gatwick. It carried 228 passengers and 14 crew. Moments after takeoff, both engines lost thrust. The plane rapidly lost altitude and crashed into a nearby medical hostel, just over a mile from the runway. Two hundred sixty people died, including 19 on the ground. One passenger survived.
The Human Element: Was It Deliberate?
India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) released a preliminary report. Captain Mohan Ranganathan, an established aviation expert, believes the crash was likely the result of conscious human action.
The Evidence
- Both fuel control switches were moved from “RUN” to “CUTOFF” within one second of each other.
- These switches are found on the cockpit pedestal, held in place by guards.
- Only a firm, planned movement can change their position—not turbulence, a bump, or electronic failure.
Cockpit Voices
Investigators heard troubling words from the cockpit:
- Pilot 1: “Why did you do it?”
- Pilot 2: “I did not do it.” The fuel cut-off action must be done manually. “It cannot be done automatically or by accident,” said Captain Ranganathan.
Who Could Have Switched Off the Engines?
- The pilot flying has both hands on the control column during takeoff and is focused on climbing out.
- The pilot monitoring—the captain—has hands free for cockpit controls, including the fuel switches.
The manual moving of both switches, moments after takeoff, makes accidental shut-off almost impossible. The protected design means outside factors like turbulence or system failure can’t explain what happened.
Possible Background: Medical Concerns and Procedures
The AAIB report hints at the captain’s possible medical history but cautions against jumping to conclusions. Authorities stress the need for a full, careful investigation. All physical evidence, data, and crew records are under review.
Public and Expert Reactions
Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu cautions, “Don’t jump to conclusions. Wait for the final report.”
Investigators say terms like “one pilot said this, one that” are too vague. Official cockpit voice records and next-level analysis are needed before blame is assigned.
This event has ignited debate about:
- Mental health screening for pilots
- Crew access to critical controls
- Better safety protocols for takeoff and emergencies
What Comes Next?
India’s aviation investigators will release a final report after reviewing all evidence, including the flight recorder, cockpit tapes, witness statements, and crew histories. Global regulators are watching. Many hope new lessons will drive improved aviation safety and mental health procedures.
The Debate: Was It Intentional?
Captain Ranganathan stressed the switches could not be moved accidentally. He pointed out that vague references to “one pilot said this, one pilot said that” don’t help. According to his professional experience:
- Only the pilot monitoring (the captain in this case) had free hands at takeoff.
- The switches require a pull and toggle under a guard rail—they are not likely to slip by mistake.
There is no sign yet of a mechanical fault or outside influence. This “manual selection” is what stands out for Captain Ranganathan. He does mention possible medical history for the captain but stresses all details and transcript evidence must be checked before the public jumps to conclusions.
Official Statement: Wait for Final Report
Authorities are urging the public and the media not to make a final judgment yet. India’s Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu told NDTV, “Don’t jump to conclusions. Wait for the final report.” Preliminary information can be incomplete or misleading. Experts want to gather every detail from cockpit voice recorders, flight data, and personal records before putting responsibility on any crew member.
Conclusion
The Air India Flight 171 crash is not only a tragedy for the families involved, but a critical moment for airline safety worldwide. Early evidence points to deliberate human action, but officials remind everyone not to speculate until the investigation is complete.
For now, the focus stays on a careful, honest review—so the skies can become safer for all.
To contact us click Here .
